The crowd booed the MGM Grand in Las Vegas Saturday night once the judges decision to award WBO welterweight champion Manny Pacquiao the victory over Juan Manuel Marquez aired over the speakers. The match could have easily went the Mexican’s way but with the card reading (116-112),(115-113), (114-114), against him, Marquez again goes winless against Pacquiao. The face of the Filipino fighter revealed relief rather than elation after the announcement but after landing 176 punches to Marquez’s 138 – the act of connecting on shots was the statistical difference.
Upon the announcement of the fight’s decision, I went straight to the Twitter-verse and sought out to see the what people thought. The common theme read amongst my feed contained the words “Marquez” and “robbery.” I agreed – but maybe not in the same way as the tweets.
Yes, there was an “attempted” robbery but the culprit, in fact was Marquez. Most boxing analysts led a lot of us to believe Manny had this trilogy wrapped up. Many people wrote him off. Blame it on the pundits who vehemently predicted a Marquez massacre and the bettors 7-1 spread with Marquez as the underdog. Yes, JMM is now a 38-year-old and his last fight in a higher weight class resulted in a beat down by Floyd Mayweather Jr. so to predict a conclusive win by Congressman Pac-Man, not a dumb bet. But boy did Marquez prove us all wrong and almost even proved Manny…almost.
This was still only an attempted robbery. And he really almost got away with it to if it weren’t for those meddling trainers.
Nacho Beristain, Marquez’s trainer, can’t be outright blamed for giving confidence in his fighter by telling him he was winning. In the middle rounds, that was an absolute fact. Marquez kept to his game plan, relying on counter-attacks but lacked the urgency to be the aggressor and seal up a win. The approach made him look like someone just trying to maintain a lead when in reality he needed to punch his way to lock up the judges points to get a lead. With Manny frustrated to find openings, Marquez would have even won the fight if he blacked-out with combos in the twelfth.
The fans who are well versed on the history between Pacquiao and Marquez already knew this fight wouldn’t pan out smoothly. Their styles compliment each other. As Manny moved up in weight classes slaughtering every Goliath that crossed his path, the “David” doppelganger in Marquez proved he was still the scariest amongst the physically intimidating.
Juan Manuel Marquez and his masterful counter-punching made Manny Pacquiao look mortal. Many thought the heavier but speed maintained Manny would do damage with his power. Evidently, Marquez new strength and conditioning coach paid off. He looked way more effective at this weight than the Mayweather bout. Thankfully the new coach got JMM to quit his training superstition of drinking his own urine.
Manny should have lost this fight. It was by far one of the worst of his career and definitively the worst during his pound for pound dubbing. Marquez and his hesitancy to attack in the final rounds did him in and that’s why the judges voted so closely the other way. If you doubt Juan’s bad decision-making then you can explain the post-fight interview where he’s covering his business with only a sombrero. I’ll leave that up to you to find the footage and if you didn’t see it, be thankful.
After all the debates cease on who you thought won or lost, there’s only on real winner for this fight – the fans.
This result may be the final key in opening the flood gates for Pacquiao v Mayweather. We know Floyd was watching this fight. With all those rumors about a May 5th fight coming from his camp, the results of this fight may give Floyd enough confidence to inking the contract. Floyd Mayweather Jr., who is another counter-puncher, now has enough fight footage from last night to work on a blueprint to take down Manny. With a Pacquiao v Marquez IV highly unlikely, both sides don’t have an excuse left to use.





A. I said pre-fight still believe that the Pac/JMM fight would be better than the Pac/Mayweather. They were just a lot more evenly matched along with JMM having less to lose than Mayweather.
B. I totally agree with your “in reality he needed to punch his way to lock up the judges points to get a lead” point and it’s another point that I made. You need to beat the champ to be the champ. Even if the numbers were dead even. JMM didn’t do that.
Here’s the thing, I was watching the fight over my friend’s crib on his big screen. Sounds fancy, right? Yeah, almost. We were streaming the fight off a laptop on to the TV lol. Still worked out fine although it was choppy at points.
I tought Marquez won that fight to be honest. In fact, I thought he won like 8 or 9 rounds. The thing that fucked him up was Manny started being the Manny I knew those last two or three rounds. He just started throwing punches and like Jason mentioned, he connected on a lot of them.
I still don’t think Manny won, but it creates this odd storyline heading to Pac/Mayweather (if it ever happens). Both fighters coming off highly controversial victories needing to put on, arguably, the fight of their lives to silence everything.
I hate admitting it, but Mayweather will crush Manny.
He just started throwing punches and like Jason mentioned, he connected on a lot of them.
——
In the beginning of the fight rounds, Marquez threw more punches and connected more than Pac only by a few. But the middle to end rounds I don’t remember 1 round where he threw more than Pac or landed anywhere within 10 punches as Manny did. He did connect cleaner punches but Pac beat him with consistency. His conservativeness, for whatever reason, killed his win.
JMM won this fight. HBO kept on saying he was a volume puncher and that’s a big reason why he won, but all that “volume” only resulted in 38 more landed punches, or barely 3 more per round, but Marquez was by far the more accurate puncher and threw punches that connected as hard if not harder than Pacquiao. Marquez got jobbed. Pacquiao is dumb overrated too, been fighting scrubs (Diaz, Clottey, Hatton), dudes that are past their primes (de la hoya, Mosley) and guys he knew he had a significant speed advantage on (Margarito, Cotto) for the past 3 years yet somehow that rendered him the best P4P and got him demigod status amongst his cult-ish fans? Fuck outta here. Logical boxing heads know he’s been overrated and has been protected by the Bob Arum machine ever since JMM made him look bad in 2008 and again last night. JMM got robbed, the look on pacquiao and his wife’s face when the decision was read says it all, they expected to lose and should have.
Money Mayweather is a faster and harder-hitting more accurate version of Márquez with better D. This fight re-affirmed my point that he’ll destroy Pacquiao. CAN’T WAIT (c) Bart Scott
I call shenanigans.
Pee-Pee Man got robbed.
That was a great fight that Marquez should have won, but it’s hard for me to get worked up over it. I don’t believe if either Mayweather or Pacquaio are in a close fight that the refs will let them lose before they fight each other, so just get it over with already. It’s like they’re the only 2 guys who don’t want to see it happen.
I cosign everything the brotha El Rosado said…..
Being Asian and a fan of Pac man, even I knew that Marquez won that. Funk what compustat says, I felt Marquez landed more flush than Manny even if Manny threw more punches.
As far as Mayweather vs. Pacquiao is concerned, styles make fights. There is no doubt that Mayweather is a beast but to say he’ll beat Manny because of how he performed against Marquez is bull. Marquez always gave Manny a hard fight. That’s like saying Manny would tool Floyd ’cause he took out DLH in 8 rounds while Mayweather squeaked out a split decision victory.
This fight must happen!
I dont think that was the point, wut is being said is that Mayweather is actually better at the same style that Marquez uses and that if Marquez can basically beat Manny twice then Money would really kill him.
As far as Mayweather vs. Pacquiao is concerned, styles make fights. There is no doubt that Mayweather is a beast but to say he’ll beat Manny because of how he performed against Marquez is bull. Marquez always gave Manny a hard fight. That’s like saying Manny would tool Floyd ’cause he took out DLH in 8 rounds while Mayweather squeaked out a split decision victory.
—————————————————–
All of this. I’m eager to see what Floyd and his people are gonna say now. May 5
As far as Mayweather vs. Pacquiao is concerned, styles make fights. There is no doubt that Mayweather is a beast but to say he’ll beat Manny because of how he performed against Marquez is bull.
________________________
Why not? Mayweather is 10x the defense fighter JMM is & his counter punching is second to none. If Mayweather easily abused JMM, JMM dismantled Pac, then why shouldn’t it be known Money May will destroy Manny?
It’s pretty simple man, Manny should avoid fighting Floyd. It will not end well at all for Manny.
the only reason pac was given the decision was because boxing wants the mayweather fight. If that fight does happen you gotta think mayweather will win. He is the absolute best counter fighter and pac sets himself up for that aaaalllllll day
If you go by stats, Manny won. If you watched the fight, it was either a Marquez win or draw. It was just no way Manny won a unanimous. The judge who scored it 116-112 was obviously biased someway due to not scoring anywhere near the other judges. One thing this did accomplish, cement my feelings that Floyd would kill Manny. Point blank.
My bad in the above post. It wasn’t unanimous.
Too much politics surrounding boxing. I just want this damn fight to happen lol. Anyone interested in Cotto vs Margarito on December 3rd? The face-off was intense.
http://www.mmalinker.com/external/frames/50084/Miguel_Cotto_vs_Antonio_Margarito_II__HBO_Face_Off_EXTENDED
Cotto v Margarito will be a way better watch than Pacquiao v Margarito. This is a make or break fight for both careers. We need a brawl for the next main event.
The betting lines are close as fuck too