For the unfamiliar, the title is actually a quote by Pablo Picasso and has to do with drawing inspiration from something while putting your touch on it. There’s a thin line between blatantly jacking someone’s idea and flipping it enough to make it your own. It’s not an unfamiliar concept to Hip-Hop, with sampling and copyright infringement banging heads since Biz Markie’s “I Need A Haircut.” I’ve never been a fan of copyright laws because of the sheer amount of Hip-Hop songs that have never seen the light of day because some forgotten artist hates the genre and doesn’t clear the sample. Shepard Fairey, the creator of the now iconic image above, is being sued by the AP for not getting proper permission to use the image in his design.
On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year’s presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warholesque red, white and blue and underlined with the caption HOPE.
Designed by Shepard Fairey, a Los-Angeles based street artist, the image has led to sales of hundreds of thousands of posters and stickers, and has become so much in demand that copies signed by Fairey have been purchased for thousands of dollars on eBay.The image, Fairey has acknowledged, is based on an Associated Press photograph, taken in April 2006 by Mannie Garcia on assignment for the AP at the National Press Club in Washington.
Fairey created the image around this time last year and it became a staple during Obama’s campaign: both officially and in grassroots efforts. I can understand the AP’s point of view and trying to protect the intellectual property of it’s members, but I think they should let this one slide. Fairey may not have followed protocol and recieved permission, but he’s come clean and admitted to using the photo. The AP can’t just retroactively give permission? Unless by “permission,” they mean getting a slice of any profits that come from this. This photo was taken in 2006 and has been laying around ever since, forgotten by probably everyone except Garcia. It’s been outta sight and outta mind ever since until Fairey came across it.
My thought? Copyright reform.
I came across this idea back in November on http://newmusicstrategies.com. The sites creator, Adrew Dubber, presented a case for shorter copyright durations in five year blocks based on popularity and monetary viability. Copyrights could be renewed after five years if it still had commercial merit, but if it didn’t it would immediately become public domain. Meaning a song like “Lollipop” would rightfully hold onto it’s copyright longer than “Pop Champagne.” This could also be applied to photography as well, in say two or three year periods. Because as it stands now, Fairey violated (& admitted) the AP copyright law, so he’ll probably have to pay some restitution. But he took a photo that was a couple years old and reinvigorated it, making it something that will probably remain a part of the American history long after all parties involved are gone. For that alone Fairey should be given credit for what he created.
Obama Artist Shepard Fairey In Legal Storm For His Audacity Of ‘Hope’ – [Times Online]


As an artist and graphic designer, im torn on this issue.
I agree with your argument, but if Fairey had used a painting i had done without asking, or paying me, id be pretty fuckin pissed off about it.
Double standards FTL.
ps – The fact that ive never seen an original piece of work done by Fairey that wasnt based directly on an existing photograph doesnt help his case either.
Of course you would, but a photo & painting are different I think. He could have easily chosen a pic off someone’s Flickr page & this would be a non issue. You couldn’t just slap Hope under the pic & get the same result.
i agree with w.c.
all he had to do was credit/pay the AP upfront and this wouldnt be an issue. those guys have longstanding practices in place, so there’s really no excuse.
My brother works directly for Shepard and I can tell you first hand since I personally know him, Shepard knows that he took the photo and really has no problem admitting it. I think the sampling analogy is right on in this instance. For the record, he and OBEY also has made no real profit from prints themselves – he’s sold them originally at fair and low price, then has let anyone and everyone reproduce it all they want. True, he’s garnered much more recognition and opportunity from it but the AP is trying to get some credit or funds from OBEY. Same as it always been…
Fairey’s a lazy artist… He’s like the street skaters who grind up on private property then bitch about being outsiders. You’re not an outsider cuz you caused $5Gs of damage to Mr. Nealy’s empty pool; you’re an outsider because you didn’t think enough to ask–Mr. Neally was probably a surfer at your age and would’ve been cool with you boarding his property under certain considerations. But no, the world is yours and you’re too young and hip to ask.
if Fairly hadda asked, AP/dude would’ve gave him the rights for a song. AP, with few exceptions, only asks that you “source your material” in short, a little byline on the bottom of the poster plus a nominal percentage of verified sales (maybe 5-10%, given how Fairey manipulates originals) would made this go away before it even started.
AP cuts these deals all the time. it would’ve been a 5 minute phone call or an exchange of like 3 emails.
but no, Fairey had to go and be a “populist rebel”.
woah!!!!
^
pretty much Franchise.
Interesting.
To me, it look like the angle on his head is different. Wouldn’t make a difference, as it’d not 100% copied? Kinda like Bowie/Vanilla Ice?
Irregardless, that photo definitely got The ‘Rack more votes.
As my Grandmother always says, “A stitch in time saves 9.” If he went through the proper channels the 1st time, this would be a non issue now.
I’m with Chris, torn.
Its not like Fairey just live-traced that image.
but it was for the greater good.
it was such an iconic and ubiquitous image that’s now indelibly tattooed on our nation’s consciousness – I’m sure Barack’s ascendency to the presidency owes a little to this facet of his support.
AP oughta let this one slide…
crooks and castles makes a tee called:
“bad artists copy, GOOD artists steal” and that’s by picasso too, so i think there’s some difference in translation/whatnot. anyways smh.
There is an app surrounding Twitter that will do this to any Twitter avatar. And then he wrote “Hope” under it. See @Jason_Pollock has had this treatment on his avatar since 2008 as I recall.